Wasn't McCain Supposed to Be Competitive in New Jersey?

The Senate election in 2002. The presidential election in 2004. The gubernatorial contest in 2005. The Senate election in 2006. Every year or two the Republicans trick the establishment media into believing that they will be competitive in New Jersey, only to flame out embarrassingly. And for a while they had folks going that John McCain would be able to make a run for it in the Garden State come November. Well, not so much.

Widespread opposition to the war in Iraq has helped give Democratic presidential contender Barack Obama a double-digit lead in New Jersey vs. Republican John McCain, according to a Fairleigh Dickinson University PublicMind poll released today.

The poll of 702 registered New Jersey voters found 49 percent favored Obama, 33 percent favored McCain, 3 percent plan to vote for someone else and the rest were undecided.

At present, the Pollster.com trend estimate, Barack Obama leads McCain in New Jersey by a 12.5 percent margin. Real Clear Politics places the spread at 10.3 percentage points. The folks who wrote up the poll underscore the finding that Obama is only leading among Clinton supporters by a 64 percent to 18 percent margin, but reading these numbers, it seems that the anemic 33 percent showing from McCain -- a full 13 points behind George W. Bush's showing in the state in 2004 -- stands out a bit more prominently than the relatively low defection rate within the Democratic ranks (though perhaps that's just my vantage). Although there may be an upside to these numbers for McCain: at least he might not feel obligated to dump a few million dollars in New Jersey because he's already so far behind...



Display:


Re: Wasn't McCain Supposed to Be Competitive in Ne (none / 0)

I suggest you not underestimate the staggering drawing power of the Garden State, and show up two hours in advance.


Hooray for John McCain!
by ragekage on Fri Jun 27, 2008 at 10:39:10 PM EST

Re: Wasn't McCain Supposed to Be Competitive in Ne (none / 0)

The fact that Clinton supporters are supporting Obama 64-18% is actually great news.  Previously, it seemed like Clinton supporters were split on whether they will support Obama.  But, the 64-18 split means that a huge percentage of Clinton supporters who previously did not support Obama have either come around or have changed to undecided.  And that's good news because becoming undecided is a transition step to eventually moving over to Obama.  

Seems like Clinton supporters represent a large portion of the overall number of 15% of voters who are undecided.  If that's the case, most of these undecideds are probably democrats or liberal independents who will, in the end, vote for the democrat, and so Obama's safe lead in New Jersey is actually even safer than the numbers suggest.


by ProfessorReo on Fri Jun 27, 2008 at 10:40:28 PM EST

Re: Wasn't McCain Supposed to Be Competitive in Ne (2.00 / 2)

no, it just means the trend was mostly rumor and push polls and lots of blog/on-air bloviating and gnashing of teeth based on the fear "they" wanted you to feel so you would "buy more papers" (these days that mostly means site and ad hits and viewer ratings of course). Slow news days since the primary fight ended so "they" needed to panic the panic-prone. As soon as a pretty white girl is killed or something expect more bloviating trying to spin this as bad somehow or other.


by zerosumgame on Fri Jun 27, 2008 at 11:37:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Wasn't McCain Supposed to Be Competitive in Ne (none / 0)

Republicans have only a little chance of winning in New Jersey in 2008, both in Presidential race and in Senate race. If a Republican resurgance is to come in New Jersey, it will be in 2009 when extremely unpopular Gov Jon Corzine is up for reelection.


by Jaxx Raxor on Fri Jun 27, 2008 at 11:49:57 PM EST

You're right on; but the Dems say the same thing (none / 0)

about VA, every four years. I've lived in every region of the state, from Tidewater to Richmond to the Northern Neck to the DC suburbs. And worked at the precinct level for Chuck Robb, Doug Wilder, Gerry Baliles, and...yes, even Mark Warner.

Last time, quite a few pundits told us that Kerry could carry the state, and he didn't really come close. The trap everyone falls into is in thinking the state is actually becoming more progressive. Credit Chuck Schumer for recruiting Jim Webb in 2006 for the Senate race: a former Reagan cabinet official, with a military background that would bring out the folks in Hampton Roads. And even this fairly conservative Republican-turned-Democrat could only defeat (a very wounded!) George Allen by 7,000 votes.

The idea that Obama could carry Virginia is very wishful thinking. The night before Doug Wilder was elected Governor--by 4,000 votes/0.1%--I told my fellow volunteers that Doug's 12-point lead over Marshall Coleman made me very nervous.


by BJJ Fighter on Sat Jun 28, 2008 at 12:50:57 AM EST

Re: Wasn't McCain (none / 0)

Not too surprising.  Kerry only beat Bush here by 6% (53-47), but Gore took in a much more impressive 16% win (56-40), considering Nader picked up much of the slack.  That's almost as good as Clinton's 54-36% defeat of Dole (18 points), which was a vast improvement over Clinton's first narrow win over Bush Sr. (43-41%).

In short, the state swings pretty strongly from election to election.  It's pretty obvious the Bush bounce is over, and New Jersey is going strong blue this year.


by Skaje on Sat Jun 28, 2008 at 10:49:41 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.